Conspiracy 9/11 - By Roger Morris
There is urgent need to recognize and question the almost total NZ media enmity
toward the 9/11 conspiracy generally, and toward Mr Richard Gage AIA architect
during his recent visit to NZ in particular...
We need to ask of Radio New Zealand and Print media why any question AT ALL of the 9/11 event being a conspiracy 'other than' a conspiracy by Bin Laden/Al Qaeda, resulted in
blanket attacks on Mr Gage being -among other things- a carpetbagger , and those
subscribing to the 9/11 evidence of explosive demolition as losers, anti Semites
and what have you. Personal attacks that identified the media as shamefully
uninformed, unimaginative and slanderous toward any notion of 9/11 being 'other
than' the 9/11/bin laden conspiracy theory.
That there are only two camps, and if you are not with it, you are nuts ... [You
are either with us, or you are with the terrorists" Bush. 2003].
The two interviews Mr Gage gave where he was allowed to put a few of the findings
he and the one THOUSAND registered engineers and architects he represents, [ Mike
Hosking on tv1, and Capital Times by Sophie Schroder ] gave the reader/viewer to
understand:
1. That there IS indeed a vast 9/11 conspiracy UNrelated to Bin Laden/Al Qaeda.
2. That the buildings were destroyed in an EXPLOSIVE manner UNrelated to
'fire-induced' sequential collapse. Buildings of this design cannot COLLAPSE
through the line of MOST resistance at UNNATURAL SPEED without removal of structure
below to allow it. That there was no 'hammer drop' nor pancake collapse, that the
buildings were 'over' built to resist such structural failure.
3. That there is an open for peer review science paper identifying both ignited and
unignited military grade super nano-thermite [incendiary-explosive] in dust collected
from the crime scene [ The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, 7-31:"Active
Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center
Catastrophe."]
4.That molten steel was found in the pile for up to 13 weeks afterwards totally at
odds with kerosene/office furnishings burn but totally in accord with use of
thermitic materials.
5. That the secretive building 7 was quite certainly controlled demolition. Mr Gage
stated NIST has conceded free-fall for 2.6 seconds - the first 100ft- of the 6.5
seconds it took this 81 columned 47 storied steel framed building, the third
structural failure that day, to completely destruct into its own footprint - but
that NIST refuses to discuss the ramifications of freefall - instead identifying a
whole new building collapse phenomenon calling it "thermal expansion" due to normal
'office furnishings fire'.
6. That 118 firemen/police/other first responders directly attest in FDNY audio
records to witnessing many other explosive events than aircraft impact within the
buildings destroyed that day. information denied for years afterwards until FOIA
actions released the transcripts.
7. That major explosive events took place in the subbasement levels moments BEFORE
jet impact. And, significantly, in the pile long afterwards.
8. That the administrative reports on the 3 buildings' destruction have not been
properly tested, the models used not allowed independent scrutiny, and those
figures produced showed evidence of serious distortion... really outright fraud
within the testing procedure,[underwriters laboratory/Kevin Ryan]-
9. That there has been no criminal investigation into the destruction, rather that
NIST and FEMA are political and not science based 'building performance assessment
reports' and not very good ones. That the 9/11 atrocity is chockablock full of
questions nobody in authority is willing to answer or acknowledge.[ignore them and
they'll go away]
10. That there is a concerted effort by international media to discredit all and
any question of the 9/11 conspiracy being 'other than' the official view.
11. that bin laden is not wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 atrocity, because they don't
have enough evidence to charge him with the crime.
12. That Mr Gage and those he represents are asking for a new INVESTIGATION,
independent and with subpoena power.
Quite a list.
Our media response?
Dianna Witchell of the Listener called the whole proposition insane and Hoskings
stupid, saying Kim Hill had 'handed Richard Gage his ass'. Which requires one to
ask, well, did she? Opinion seems divided on whose ass got 'handed', and whose
deserved to be, but as reference to the major crime of our life time, which has
radicalized a global military machine into the madness of illegal unilateral
pre-emptive 'revenge/resource' wars -destroying the imaginative process of our
intelligentsia in the bargain - might not we expect our fourth estate to THINK
further ?
Print media partiality was even more extreme, where you could find it. Cut and paste
mockery dismissing Jennette Fitzsimons meeting with Richard Gage by all kinds of
name calling, and rather than asking her, as a senior and respected Politician,
her specific concerns, lazily satisfied itself by Ph.D student analysis of what
constitutes 'the conspiracy theorist '[Cass Sunstein model], happily identifying a
global community of 9/11 activists as 'anti-semite' losers hanging onto any nutcase
scenario you wish to mention . Determined to lump all 'conspiracies ' into one pot
in an effort to short circuit the singularity of the WTC explosive demolition event.
Jim Mora employed the intellectual rigour of the skeptics society, Gary McCormack
and Bruce Slane ex privacy commission to vilify and slander in every conceivable
manner the reputation of a man none had met. None wished to meet. None wished to
ask any questions of. None had obviously bothered to research the findings of.
Tommy Honeys' vague and dismissive account [ArchitectureNZ 6.2009/Across The Board
"Truther takeover at TE PAPA"]would have us believe the 118 bona fide eyewitness
reports from first responders and video evidence recorded at ground zero of
explosive events occurring 'other than' the aircraft impacts, were "based on one
hysterical comment overheard by a fireman".
I beg your pardon?! 118 first responders -directly attesting in FDNY audio
transcripts having heard/witnessed explosives going off in at least four buildings
OTHER than those of WTC plane impact - not conjecture- facts on the public record
-[information denied for years until FOIA actions had them released] including
FDNY's own Chief of Safety, Albert Turi, and FDNY's chief, Ray Downey, the
"premiere collapse expert in the country" according to a fellow
chief,[AE9/11truth.org], both speaking of the presence of explosives in the Towers
prior to the failures... and Mr Honey tells us they were all based on one
'confused' 'overheard' memory of the day? ... Would Mr Honey like to test this
outrageous hypothesis on the 'firemen for 9/11 truth or Patriots for 9/11truth or
Journal of 9/11 studies or Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth websites and answer
for himself the first responders who WILL respond? Perhaps check with the fire
chiefs themselves? Give them a ring. I can only imagine ...
Perhaps we should consider Mr Honeys own words , whereby those of us not accepting
the official conspiracy theory "instead have constructed their own theory based on
their own evidence, much of it flimsy" and 'faith' based. Well. Building 7 was
NOT flimsy. It was a 47 storied steel high rise in Manhattan. It had over 80
vertical columns.The official NIST[National Institute of Standards and
Technology] theory, as accepted and defended by Mr Honey, introduces the entirely
new building collapse phenomena of 'Thermal expansion' : fire induced sequential
collapse, as cause.
Phenomena never seen before nor since that infamous day.
NIST, by computer model, identified the PIVOT "point of 'collapse" of this huge
building being 'shear studs' breaking in the concrete flooring during 'normal
office furnishings fire' . The thermal elongation of beams on Floor 13, causing
the steel girder connecting Column 44 to Column 79 [bolted and welded ] to
disconnect [walk]from the latter, so that it was no longer supporting it. This loss
of support for column 79, caused floor 13 to locally collapse , which triggered a
cascade of collapses down to the 5th floor. Then Column 79, having lost support
from the girder and the floors, buckled. This started the chain reaction that lead
to the total collapse - 6.5 seconds later- of the entire 81 columned steel framed
building into its own footprint. The first 2.6 seconds of which is in total
FREE-FALL, as acknowledge by NIST itself. That means "no resistance" - nothing
stopping it. Free fall.
All due to 'thermal expansion' of the simulated floor beams and breaking of
simulated shear studs connecting the simulated steel to the simulated concrete
floor slabs in the model. Which failed because the steel beams in the simulation
expanded further and more quickly than the concrete slabs in the model. A
surprising result since Steel and concrete expand at virtually the same amount under
heat. Until those seeking answers learned that NIST, while running its simulation,
'heated' only the simulated steel, not also the simulated concrete. Thus the
simulation predicted the failure of the shear studs.[The Mysterious Collapse of
WTC7. D.R.Griffin pp153 and 220] [NIST NCSTAR 1-9:352: "No thermal expansion or
material degradation was considered for the concrete slab, as the slab was not
heated in this analysis". as drawn by Loel Barr.[NIST]
Feeling 'the faith' yet?
It is worth noting again that Richard Gage represents over 1000 REGISTERED
engineers and architects who build these buildings. This is not a joke. His
presentation delivered a science based physical response to an official and
politicized NIST report that is a computer model construct THEORY, with
identifiable frauds.
A computer model the architecture of which we are 'not allowed' independant
scrutiny of. A computer model can do whatever it is told to do...
The questions are therefore begged.
Why has journalism not picked up on this? Been able or willing to contend without
obvious [A priori] bias, the substantive questions surrounding 9/11 as conspiracy?
Why have our media commentators accepted the commission report/NIST conspiracy
theory so completely, in the face of so much information pointing otherwise? ... Dug
deeper. Been INTERESTED? Contended with the networks displayed here that have
streamed into an American military machine in Eurasia; as forecast by senior neocon
[PNAC] pundits BEFORE 9/11, a presence requiring only "A new Pearl Harbor" like event
to allow. Why haven't our major journalists explored the 'cover' 9/11 provided for
real politik to occur. The ongoing war of terror, the Patriot Act introduction,
civil rights reduction/ Geneva Conventions/Habeas Corpus suspensions:secrecy
provisions, the legal abomination of Guantanamo and Baghram, WMD LIES /private
armies+ arms industries+ the privatization of Government. What is COG? oil and
the emergence of Full Spectrum Dominance as strategy. State sanctioned violence.
Perception management techniques. TORTURE and extra-judicial assassination as a
legitimate weapons of war. The suspension of imagination. All built on the
conspiracy of 9/11.
Why is the land of the free being turned into uniformed security state.
Why are none among our intellectual elite contending with the reality of the 9/11
conspiracy as the major psychological event of our life time??
Roger Morris,
Artists for 9/11 Truth (http://www.911artists.com/)